An ongoing mapping project by a research team from the Faculty of Arts and Design at the University of Canberra
Welcome to an architectural wake.
Fifty projects that have been lost in Canberra’s urban development.
Northside. Southside. Online and in print.
Selected Canberra architectural highlights.
Sally Farrah, Mike Louw, Ben Ennis-Butler & Emma Phillips
Rob Henry, Gia Ryan Lewis
Amy Jarvis, Rachel Jackson & Edwina Jans
Antoinette Buchanan
Winner, 2024 National Trust ACT Heritage Awards, Heritage Education and Promotion category
Featured in the 2024 ACT Heritage Festival.
The average age of buildings in Australia is about 50 years, when in fact, these constructions themselves could last closer to 100 years. In the room of reconstructed perspectives, the average age of buildings was only 30-35 years. We find adaptive reuse is at a minimum which, of course, has consequences for the preservation of heritage and memory.
Also, this research reveals that significant building stock from the decade of the 1960s has been lost – in fact, 20 of the 50 buildings discovered and shown here. This needs to be evaluated against heritage listing criteria, as this post-war moment represents both a significant moment in Australian architectural history, and produced many high calibre buildings.
It is important that the Heritage Register can be more amenable to recommendations of mid-century architecture. While many of these are in the Australian Institute of Architects’ Register of Significant Twentieth-Century Architecture, they may evade the ACT Heritage Register, and therefore have uncertain futures.
It is interesting to observe the typologies of buildings that belong to certain decades. For example, the motel boom along Northbourne Avenue in the 1950s and 60s is a fascinating development, and sadly, is completely unrecognisable today. These post-war memories and this important car-based experience of Canberra’s heritage has been lost. It also reveals that significant medium-density housing stock has been lost, which is concerning in a moment where we face a housing crisis.
It also might serve to examine and question planning policies that might be having a negative long-term effect on Canberra’s urban development. For example, the city’s unique 99-year leasehold system, zoning, or clauses that promote the same building typology be maintained and specify tight construction timelines, are limiting adaptive reuse opportunities. We hope that this exhibition encourages the potential of architecture, urban, and heritage outcomes of adaptive reuse in Canberra.
Finally, it also hopes to centralise a public record of these archival images and drawings, which are scattered across the ACT, but also can be found in NSW and Victorian archives.
Have you any other memories or photographs of projects in Canberra that you would like to tell us about?
Let us know!